I’ll give you a few reasons. First, Wikipedia is one of the most visited
sites on the web. In February 2014, the site was averaging 18 billion page
views a month 18 billion. That’s
like saying everyone living in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and, oh,
Zimbabwe looked at 36 pages this month. I can tell you my library’s website
doesn’t get that kind of attention. Does yours? But Wikipedia, by nature, is a
work in progress. It doesn’t have all the answers. As Josep Serra,
Director of Museu Picasso, says, “Museums [Libraries and archives] have the
knowledge and the documentation, and Wikipedia has a global reach and a
circulation far beyond anything any museum could achieve on its own.” So why
not work together?
Usually i don't use Wikipedia.
Michael Szajewski of Ball State University wrote about this in his
article, “Using
Wikipedia to Enhance the Visibility of Digitized Archival Assets.” Some of the numbers
he shares are pretty fantastic: 40 assets viewed 13,000 times (an increase of
600%); 10,000 pageviews referred from Wikipedia (5x more than any other
source); 300% increase in page views for the 149-asset collection. Not too
shabby!
No comments:
Post a Comment